Student Forums
A journal of social practice & professional engagement for the Antioch community
 

Criminal Defense, Civil Rights – The Police Bureaucracy & Race in Chicago: Greta Treistman ’17 at Law Offices of Phillip Brigham

For my fourth and final co-op, I sought an experience in the world of law. In my prior work at North Star Fund, I had come across the important role played by legal clinics and civil rights lawyers in justice movements and activism. I wanted to get a better sense of the extent to which United States law can be used as a tool to pursue justice for the systemically oppressed. I have also taken an interest in police brutality and misconduct in relation to racial injustice, topics which have dominated the headlines throughout my time in college thanks to the Black Lives Matter movement. I am working as a legal aide for Law Office of Phillip Brigham, a practice dealing in criminal defense and family law. My employer is located in the city of Chicago, which is nationally infamous for its high rates of gun violence, corrupt police force, and pronounced racial segregation and inequality.

Phillip Brigham has a small, independent practice in an office suite that he shares with four other attorneys who also work independently. Sometimes their cases overlap, or one of them will take on work that is a conflict of interest for another. They all work in different areas of law. In Phillip’s practice, we take on cases related to family law: child custody, divorce, domestic violence, international child abduction; criminal defense: assault, attempted murder; and civil rights law. On a day-to-day basis, handling all of these different cases (currently the practice has 30 open cases, plus pending cases and recently settled cases) involves drafting legal documents, filing documents with the court, going to hearings and status and trials in the courthouse, communicating with the opposing party, and doing legal research. Most of our cases are in Cook County, so when we go to court we go to the Cook County Courthouse, also known as the Richard J. Daley Center. Domestic Relations, where most of our hearings are, is on the top floor of the courthouse, floor 30.

On most days I take the red line downtown to the loop and come into the office around 9:30 am. I act as the receptionist for the office, answering the phone and greeting people who come in. I spend my time drafting court forms, motions, and pleadings, filing those documents and mailing copies to related parties, and doing research for cases. Sometimes this means going to the Daley Center Law Library, where law librarians will help you find the right books of legal code to answer your question. Things are organized in a complex way that is different from a regular library.

Currently, we are in the process of reviewing discovery for one of our most high-profile cases, on which we are working in partnership with several other law firms. The case is a class action suit against the city of Chicago and the Chicago Police Department involving Homan Square, a police interrogation center that has been compared to CIA “black sites” due to allegations of torture, illegal detention, and various other civil rights infringements. The Chicago Police Department has a long history of hiring torturers and covering up corruption (see Jon Burge). Cases related to Homan Square have gained international attention due to detailed coverage in The Guardian, which has been augmented through actions by local protest groups working around the Movement for Black Lives. The current class action suit has been brought as a result of a case brought a few years ago by our client, whose story was also covered in The Guardian. Homan Square is located in South Chicago, an area with one of the country’s highest rates of gun violence, an area that is predominately African-American, and that is the site of frequent police misconduct, especially related to narcotics (the “war on drugs” which turned out to be a war on Black people).

There is no court date set for this case yet, as it is still deep in the discovery process. Discovery means that both sides can request related documents and require that the opposing side turn over evidence and answer a limited number of questions (“interrogatories”). As our opposing party is CPD and it is a large class action suit, this means that there is a lot of discovery: thousands and thousands of pages of documents. Part of my job is to organize and go through these files. For the most part, these are complaint reports filed against Chicago police officers and arrest reports related to our clients. Each case generates mountains of paperwork, and a lot of it is useless to us. One of the reasons it’s so difficult to prosecute the police (among many, many reasons) is that there is such a quantity of paperwork, and a limited number of employees who care enough or are paid enough to be thorough. It is very easy for things to slip through the cracks in the discovery process. The Chicago Tribune has reported on the failures of discovery in the large bureaucracy of city government. Reforming the discovery process was also one of the recommendations of a recent report on alleged misconduct by CPD. The report pointed no fingers and claimed that there was no intentional misconduct. It is easy to put off laying blame when failure and errors can be attributed to the lumbering, inefficient bureaucracy. Even if activists are successful in getting the Department of Justice involved in a case, the DOJ must follow federal code, which means they are looking for conspiracy or intentional racism and misconduct. Many incidents involving racist policing are not necessarily premeditated and planned, they are simply the accepted norm. Those cases are impossible to prosecute because there aren’t laws and precedents set for punishment. We need new laws and policies that are able to acknowledge the problem in the first place.

Having followed the Movement for Black Lives since the events in Ferguson, Missouri unfolded in the summer of 2014, this co-op is providing me with complexified insight into the opposing sides of the activist movement. In the past two years I’ve read the news articles, followed the social media activists, participated in the movement around the John Crawford case in Beavercreek, Ohio (near Antioch’s campus), and worked for a grassroots organizing funder which supported Black Lives Matter movements in Manhattan. These experiences prompted me to deepen my studies of the history of race and racialized oppression in the Americas. Seeing the legal side, the police side, the government side, the bureaucratic side, up close and personal has been uniquely informative. In fighting police brutality and systemic racism in our bureaucracies, what are our tools? What are the pressure points? Even if you can’t ultimately take apart the master’s house with the master’s tools, it’s still a good idea to know what those tools are and know how to use them — and know how they might be used against you.

Share Post
Written by

<p>Greta Treistman is currently pursuing a self-designed degree entitled Social Transformation in the Americas. As a student at Antioch College, she has served as Student Space Coordinator and Assistant Editor of the Antioch Record. She has worked as an Administrative Intern at Fraenkel Gallery in San Francisco, as a Marketing and Communications Intern at Expanish Spanish School in Buenos Aires, as an Assistant to the Program Coordinator at North Star Fund in New York City, and as a Legal Aide at Law Office of Phillip Brigham in Chicago. Her interests include community arts and collective space, resource organization, racial and educational justice, and creating connections between people and information. She hopes to go on to study Library and Information Science, and to become a networking node in the organic, bionic, social universe.</p> <p>She expects to graduate in Spring of 2017.</p>

No comments

LEAVE A COMMENT